Potentiating Response to Drop-Jump Protocols on Sprint Acceleration: Drop-Jump Volume and Intrarepetition Recovery Duration
Moody, Jeremy A.
MetadataShow full item record
Potentiating response to drop-jump protocols on sprint acceleration: drop-jump volume and intrarepetition recovery duration. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2018—The purpose of this study was to investigate the postactivation potentiation response first to bounce drop jump (BDJ) volume; second, BDJ intrarepetition recovery duration and recovery duration between BDJs and 20-meter (including 5- and 10-m split times) sprint performance. The study was undertaken in 2 parts, the first part compared different volumes of BDJs and the second part compared different BDJ intrarepetition recovery periods. The effect of recovery periods between the BDJs and the subsequent 20-m sprints was examined in both parts 1 and 2 (15 seconds, 4, 8, and 12 minutes). Fourteen (mean ± SD: age = 20.83 ± 1.26 years; height = 1.77 ± 0.04 m; and mass = 74.89 ± 6.07 kg) (part 1) and 15 (mean ± SD: age = 20.64 ± 1.00 years; height = 1.78 ± 0.06 m; and mass = 75.67 ± 6.28 kg) (part 2) male collegiate and club hurling players volunteered to participate. A randomized cross-over design was used to compare BDJ volumes (1, 2, and 3 sets of 3 repetitions) and BDJ intrarepetition recovery time (15 vs. 60 seconds) after a warm-up followed by 2 baseline 20-m sprints. The results in part 1 reported a significant improvement in 5- and 10-m sprint time for 1 set of 3 BDJs between baseline and 4 minutes (5 m: −2.34%, p = 0.04, effect size [ES] = −0.043; 10 m: −1.42%, p = 0.03, ES = −0.35), and baseline and 12 minutes (5 m: −3.33%, p = 0.03, ES = −0.57; 10 m: −2.13%, p = 0.01, ES = −0.52). Part 2 reported a significant improvement in 5-m sprint time between baseline and 15 seconds (5 m: −3.38%, p = 0.01, ES = −0.83; 10 m: −2.07%, p = 0.02, ES = −0.58) after the BDJs. The findings support the use of 1 set of 3 BDJs using a 15-second intrarepetition recovery period to maximize 5-, 10-, and 20-m sprint performance after 15 seconds of recovery after the final BDJ in hurling players. The acute response to this BDJ protocol proves to be time efficient and effective in acutely improving sprint acceleration.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research;
Byrne, P.J., Moody, J.A., Cooper, S.M., Callanan, D. and Kinsella, S. (2018) 'Potentiating Response to Drop-Jump Protocols on Sprint Acceleration: Drop-Jump Volume and Intrarepetition Recovery Duration' https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002720
Article published in Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research available at https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002720
- Sport Research Groups 
Showing items related by title, author, subject and abstract.
Pinkrah, Henry (University of Wales Institute Cardiff, 2012)Context: Delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is the damage and pain, which occurs in muscles post-exercise. DOMS is a symptom experienced by anyone who has partaken in exercise training, particularly eccentric exercise. ...
Overestimation of Required Recovery Time During Repeated Sprint Exercise With Self-Regulated Recovery Phillips, S.M.; Thompson, R.; Oliver, Jon (Wolters Kluwer, 2014-12)This study investigated the reliability and accuracy of self-regulated recovery time and performance during repeated sprinting. On 4 occasions, 14 men (24.5 ± 5.0 years) completed 10 × 6 seconds cycle sprints against 7.5% ...
How is repeated sprint performance affected by different intensities of recovery? Active vs Passive Tanner, Sam (Cardiff Metropolitan University, 2013)The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of different intensities of recovery on subsequent repeated sprint performance. Nine males who regularly participate in sport performed 6 six second sprints, interspersed ...