Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHowells, Karen
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T09:50:44Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T09:50:44Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-01
dc.identifier.citationHowells, K. (2014) 'The dual relationship – the neophyte dilemma', Sport & Exercise Psychology Review, 10(3), 87-90en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://shop.bps.org.uk/sport-exercise-psychology-review-vol-10-no-3-september-2014.html
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10369/10104
dc.descriptionArticle published in Sport & Exercise Psychology Review in September 2014 available at https://shop.bps.org.uk/sport-exercise-psychology-review-vol-10-no-3-september-2014.htmlen_US
dc.description.abstractNearly three years ago I embarked on the British Psychological Society (BPS) Qualification in Sport and Exercise Psychology (QSEP) to qualify as an accredited sport psychologist. Now, approaching the final stages of that qualification I am reflecting on an aspect of the process that has presented me with an ongoing dilemma – the appropriateness of my dual relationship for the first two years of my practice as a Level 2 UKCC swimming coach, and as a sport psychology practitioner in training. In occupying this dual relationship I found that there were pragmatic and complementary benefits for my coaching and consultancy practice, but also areas of conflict that had ethical and practical implications. In this paper I look at those issues.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBritish Psychological Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSport & Exercise Psychology Review;
dc.titleThe dual relationship - the Neophyte dilemmaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-02-01
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record