Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRehman, Asma Abdul
dc.contributor.authorBenamraoui, Abdelhafid
dc.contributor.authorDad, Aasim Munir
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-25T09:06:46Z
dc.date.available2019-04-25T09:06:46Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-20
dc.identifier.citationRehman, A.A., Benamraoui, A. and Dad, A.M. (2018) 'A comparative study of Islamic and conventional banks’ risk management practices: empirical evidence from Pakistan', Journal of Banking Regulation, pp.1-14. DOI: 10.1057/s41261-017-0046-z.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1750-2071
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10369/10450
dc.descriptionArticle published in Journal of Banking regulation on 20 June 2017 (online), available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-017-0046-z.en_US
dc.description.abstractWhile conventional bank risk management practices are well documented in the literature, there is limited research devoted at comparing the risk management practices of Islamic and conventional banks and how the recent financial crisis affected the approach taken in each banking model to manage the risks. In this paper, we use self-administered questionnaire to collect data from 150 bank senior managers and risk specialists from Pakistani conventional and Islamic banks to identify the main contributing factors to their risk management practices after the 2007–2008 financial crisis. The study results reveal that risk identification, risk assessment and analysis, credit risk analysis and risk governance are the most efficient and influential variables in explaining the risk management practices of Islamic banks, while understanding risk management, credit risk analysis and risk governance are the most significant and contributing variables in the risk management practices of conventional banks. Differences are also observed between Islamic and conventional banks in their liquidity risk analysis and risk governance. The results presented in this study are likely to benefit bank managers, investors, regulators and policymakers as they will serve them as guide when developing, reformulating and overseeing the bank(s) existing risk management practices.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Banking Regulation;
dc.titleA comparative study of Islamic and conventional banks’ risk management practices: empirical evidence from Pakistanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-017-0046-z
dcterms.dateAccepted2017
rioxxterms.funderCardiff Metropolitan Universityen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectCardiff Metropolian (Internal)en_US
rioxxterms.versionAMen_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-04-25
dc.refexceptionThere was a delay in securing the final peer-reviewed text
rioxxterms.funder.project37baf166-7129-4cd4-b6a1-507454d1372een_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record