Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMusoke, David
dc.contributor.authorKarani, George
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Keith
dc.contributor.authorNdejjo, Rawlence
dc.contributor.authorAtusingwize, Edwinah
dc.contributor.authorGuwatudde, David
dc.contributor.authorMusoke, Miph
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-14T10:16:01Z
dc.date.available2019-05-14T10:16:01Z
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.identifier.citationMusoke, D., Karani, G., Morris, K., Ndejjo, R., Atusingwize, E., Guwatudde, D. and Musoke, M.B. (2018) 'Integrated approach to malaria prevention at household level in rural communities in Wakiso district, Uganda: impact evaluation of a pilot project', African Health Sciences, 18(4), pp.1144-1156. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v18i4.35.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10369/10491
dc.descriptionArticle published in African Health Sciences in December 2018, available open access at: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v18i4.35.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The integrated approach to malaria prevention, which advocates for the use of several malaria prevention methods at households, is being explored to complement other existing strategies. We implemented a pilot project that promoted the integrated approach to malaria prevention in two rural communities in Wakiso district, Uganda. Objectives: This paper presents the impact evaluation findings of the project carried out 2 years after implementation with a focus on changes in knowledge and practices on malaria prevention. Methods: The project evaluation was cross-sectional in design and employed both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. The quantitative survey was conducted among 540 households (household heads being participants) while the qualitative component involved 4 focus group discussions among community health workers (CHWs). Chi-square test was used to compare quantitative results from the evaluation with those of the baseline while thematic analysis was employed for qualitative data. Results: There was a statistically significant positive change in malaria prevention practices in the evaluation compared with the baseline regarding indoor residual spraying (χ2 = 7.9, p = 0.019), mosquito screening of windows and ventilators (χ2 = 62.3, p = 0.001), and closing windows of houses before 6:00 pm (χ2 = 60.2, p < 0.001). The CHWs trained during the project were found to be highly knowledgeable on the various malaria prevention methods in the integrated approach, and continued to promote their use in the community. Conclusion: Findings of the impact evaluation give promise that utilisation of integrated malaria prevention can be enhanced if use of multiple methods is promoted in communities.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAfrican Journals Onlineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAfrican Health Sciences;
dc.titleIntegrated approach to malaria prevention at household level in rural communities in Wakiso district, Uganda: impact evaluation of a pilot projecten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v18i4.35
dcterms.dateAccepted2018
rioxxterms.funderCardiff Metropolitan Universityen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectCardiff Metropolian (Internal)en_US
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-05-14
rioxxterms.funder.project37baf166-7129-4cd4-b6a1-507454d1372een_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record