• English
    • Welsh
  • English 
    • English
    • Welsh
  • Login
Search DSpace:
  • Home
  • Research at Cardiff Met
  • Library Services
  • Contact Us
View item 
  • DSpace home
  • Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences
  • Sport Research Groups
  • View item
  • DSpace home
  • Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences
  • Sport Research Groups
  • View item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Potentiating Response to Drop-Jump Protocols on Sprint Acceleration: Drop-Jump Volume and Intrarepetition Recovery Duration

Thumbnail
View/open
Author's post print (293.0Kb)
Author
Byrne, Paul J.
Moody, Jeremy A.
Cooper, Stephen-Mark
Callanan, Danielle
Kinsella, Sharon
Date
2020-02-15
Acceptance date
2020-02-01
Type
Article
acceptedVersion
Publisher
Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins
ISSN
1064-8011
1533-4287 (online)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the postactivation potentiation response first to bounce drop jump (BDJ) volume; second, BDJ intrarepetition recovery duration and recovery duration between BDJs and 20-meter (including 5- and 10-m split times) sprint performance. The study was undertaken in 2 parts, the first part compared different volumes of BDJs and the second part compared different BDJ intrarepetition recovery periods. The effect of recovery periods between the BDJs and the subsequent 20-m sprints was examined in both parts 1 and 2 (15 seconds, 4, 8, and 12 minutes). Fourteen (mean ± SD: age = 20.83 ± 1.26 years; height = 1.77 ± 0.04 m; and mass = 74.89 ± 6.07 kg) (part 1) and 15 (mean ± SD: age = 20.64 ± 1.00 years; height = 1.78 ± 0.06 m; and mass = 75.67 ± 6.28 kg) (part 2) male collegiate and club hurling players volunteered to participate. A randomized cross-over design was used to compare BDJ volumes (1, 2, and 3 sets of 3 repetitions) and BDJ intrarepetition recovery time (15 vs. 60 seconds) after a warm-up followed by 2 baseline 20-m sprints. The results in part 1 reported a significant improvement in 5- and 10-m sprint time for 1 set of 3 BDJs between baseline and 4 minutes (5 m: −2.34%, p = 0.04, effect size [ES] = −0.043; 10 m: −1.42%, p = 0.03, ES = −0.35), and baseline and 12 minutes (5 m: −3.33%, p = 0.03, ES = −0.57; 10 m: −2.13%, p = 0.01, ES = −0.52). Part 2 reported a significant improvement in 5-m sprint time between baseline and 15 seconds (5 m: −3.38%, p = 0.01, ES = −0.83; 10 m: −2.07%, p = 0.02, ES = −0.58) after the BDJs. The findings support the use of 1 set of 3 BDJs using a 15-second intrarepetition recovery period to maximize 5-, 10-, and 20-m sprint performance after 15 seconds of recovery after the final BDJ in hurling players. The acute response to this BDJ protocol proves to be time efficient and effective in acutely improving sprint acceleration.
Journal/conference proceeding
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research;
Citation
Byrne, P.J., Moody, J.A., Cooper, S.M., Callanan, D. and Kinsella, S. (2020) 'Potentiating Response to Drop-Jump Protocols on Sprint Acceleration: Drop-Jump Volume and Intrarepetition Recovery Duration', The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 34(3), pp.717-727. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002720
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10369/10962
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002720
Description
Article published in The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research available at https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002720
Rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Sponsorship
Cardiff Metropolitan University (Grant ID: Cardiff Metropolian (Internal))
Collections
  • Sport Research Groups [1088]

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, subject and abstract.

  • Thumbnail

    Overestimation of Required Recovery Time During Repeated Sprint Exercise With Self-Regulated Recovery 

    Phillips, S.M.; Thompson, R.; Oliver, Jon (Wolters Kluwer, 2014-12)
    This study investigated the reliability and accuracy of self-regulated recovery time and performance during repeated sprinting. On 4 occasions, 14 men (24.5 ± 5.0 years) completed 10 × 6 seconds cycle sprints against 7.5% ...
  • Thumbnail

    How is repeated sprint performance affected by different intensities of recovery? Active vs Passive 

    Tanner, Sam (Cardiff Metropolitan University, 2013)
    The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of different intensities of recovery on subsequent repeated sprint performance. Nine males who regularly participate in sport performed 6 six second sprints, interspersed ...
  • Thumbnail

    Is repeated-sprint ability related to repeated-agility performance and does a repeated-sprint training intervention improve repeated-agility performance? 

    Crossfield, James (University of Wales Institute Cardiff, 2010)
    The aim of the present study was to examine whether there is a relationship between repeated-sprint ability (RSA) and repeated-agility performance. Relationship tests were used between pre-training and post-training ...

Browse

DSpace at Cardiff MetCommunities & CollectionsBy issue dateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis collectionBy issue dateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact us | Send feedback | Administrator