Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrancis, Mark
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Ron
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T15:26:17Z
dc.date.available2021-02-02T15:26:17Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-29
dc.identifier.citationFrancis, M., Thomas, A. and Fisher, R. (2021), "Systematic analysis of the methodological structure of the lean literature", International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2020-0050
dc.identifier.issn1756-669X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10369/11279
dc.descriptionArticle published in International Journal of Quality and Services Science available at https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2020-0050en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to analyse and evaluate the methodological structure of the Lean literature so that its characteristics and influence among academics and practitioners might be better understood. We define ‘methodological structure’ to be comprised of six categorical components: publication category, degree of methodological disclosure, research strategies, data collection instruments, type of data collected & analysed, and type of research informants. This study is a systematic bibliometric analysis of the Lean literature. It has a two-stage research design. The first stage involves the identification of the top fifty most highly cited publications on ‘Lean’, with the resultant reference details being entered into a Focal Population Set (FPS) spreadsheet. The second stage involves coding and adding the six component fields of the methodological structure for each of the FPS entries. Both citation analysis and publication counting are then used to analyse patterns in these six components of methodological structure. The top fifty publications in the FPS represent over 52,700 citations. All are either journal papers or books, but books are the most influential. Based upon this FPS sample, the Lean literature is found to be both largely atheoretical in nature and also methodologically weak. Over half of the FPS publications are Viewpoint-type publications and 46% have no methodological disclosure. The Lean literature is predominantly qualitative in nature. Where disclosed, the most common research strategy is the case study and the most common data collection instrument is the interview. High and mid-level managers are the most frequently encountered research informants, whilst shop floor workers are infrequently utilised. This paper starts with the most extensive known systematic review of systematic reviews of the Lean literature; the result of which is the characterisation of a number of gaps in this body of knowledge. One of these gaps is the lack of any previous citation analysis (CA). The paper then proceeds to address this gap by providing the first CA within the Lean literature. This is also the most comprehensive known CA within the field of Operations and Supply Chain Management more generally. As a consequence of this analysis, previously unknown patterns and insights into the methodological structure of the Lean literature are revealed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Quality and Services Science;
dc.subjectLean literature, Bibliometric analysis, Citation analysis, Publication countingen_US
dc.titleSystematic analysis of the methodological structure of the lean literatureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2020-0050
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-01-12
rioxxterms.funderCardiff Metropolitan Universityen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectCardiff Metropolian (Internal)en_US
rioxxterms.versionAMen_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project37baf166-7129-4cd4-b6a1-507454d1372een_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record