Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPerham, Nick
dc.contributor.authorBanbury, S.P.
dc.contributor.authorJones, D.M.
dc.date.accessioned2008-10-17T11:25:39Z
dc.date.available2008-10-17T11:25:39Z
dc.date.issued2007-05-01en_UK
dc.identifier.citation(2007) Memory 15 (4), pp.465-473en_UK
dc.identifier.issn0965-8211en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10369/373
dc.description.abstractMost research on auditory distraction on task performance focuses on those features of the sound that determine a drop in efficiency, with scant regard for examining the processing properties inherent in the focal task. We report how one such property, retrieval strategy, can also influence the degree of disruption by background sound. Using a task that called for the retrieval of realistic train journey information, we showed that retrieval by categories of verbal sequences was not susceptible to disruption by office sound—65–75 dB(A). However, versions of the task requiring either free or serial recall showed evidence of disruption, a pattern of results consistent with the changing-state account of the irrelevant sound effect, which highlights the key role of serial rehearsal in determining disruption.
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_UK
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMemoryen_UK
dc.titleReduction in auditory distraction by retrieval strategyen_UK
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658210701288244en_UK


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record