Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShave, Rob
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Keith
dc.contributor.authorWhyte, Greg
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorHart, Emma
dc.contributor.authorArtis, Nigel
dc.contributor.authorOxborough, David
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-04T09:15:56Z
dc.date.available2013-07-04T09:15:56Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationShave, R., George, K., Whyte, G., Middleton, N., Hart, E., Artis, N. and Oxborough, D. (2009) 'A comparison of Doppler, tissue Doppler imaging, and strain rate imaging in the assessment of postexercise left ventricular function', Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 34(1), pp.33-39en_US
dc.identifier.issn1715-5312
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10369/4405
dc.description.abstractLeft ventricular (LV) function is characterized by contraction in the longitudinal, radial, and circumferential planes. Previous studies of postexercise changes in LV function have assessed global indices of LV function. The purpose of this study was to use 2-dimensional (2D) strain analysis to examine LV function following marathon running in the circumferential, radial, and longitudinal planes, and to compare these data with other global and regional indices of function. Fifteen (mean ± SD: age, 32 ± 7 years; stature, 1.76 ± 0.08 m; body mass, 77.8 ± 8.2 kg) competitors in the London Marathon were echocardiographically assessed pre- and postrace. 2D strain (ejection fraction (EF), Doppler (early (E) and late (A) trans-mitral filling), tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) (systolic (S′) and early diastolic (E′) wall-motion velocities); TDI-derived longitudinal strain (εTDI), and systolic and diastolic strain rate (SRTDI); and 2D-derived peak circumferential, radial, and longitudinal strain (ε2D), and systolic and diastolic strain rate (SR2D) were examined. Differences pre- and postrace completion were assessed using paired t tests, with alpha set at 0.01. All participants completed the marathon in a mean time of 213 ± 41 min. A varied response was observed for measures of LV systolic and diastolic function following completion of the marathon (mean ± SD): EF, 63 ± 6 vs. 63 ± 7% (p > 0.01); E:A, 1.70 ± 0.37 vs. 1.17 ± 0.37; E′:A′, 2.36 ± 0.79 vs. 1.60 ± 0.57 (p < 0.01); mean longitudinal εTDI, 19.1 ± 5.1 vs. 17.5 ± 4.2% (p < 0.01); mean longitudinal diastolic SRTDI, 1.81 ± 0.54 vs. 1.58 ± 0.51·s–1 (p < 0.01); mean longitudinal systolic SR2D, 0.73 ± 0.21 vs. 0.97 ± 0.22·s–1 (p < 0.01); mean longitudinal diastolic SR2D, 0.94 ± 0.34 vs. 1.01 ± 0.23·s–1 (p > 0.01); mean radial systolic SR2D, 1.20 ± 0.15 vs. 1.45 ± 0.32·s–1 (p < 0.01); mean radial diastolic SR2D, 1.19 ± 0.25 vs. 1.29 ± 0.41·s–1 (p > 0.01); mean circumferential systolic SR2D, –1.09 ± 0.16 vs. –1.24 ± 0.18·s–1 (p < 0.01); and mean circumferential diastolic SR2D, –1.27 ± 0.28 vs. –1.22 ± 0.31·s–1 (p > 0.01). Marathon running promotes a varied echocardiographic response, with some functional parameters showing no change, some increasing, and some decreasing postexercise. This varied response likely reflects the complexities of cardiac function and highlights the need to adopt a multimodality approach when assessing cardiac function following exercise.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNRC Research Press
dc.relation.ispartofseriesApplied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism;
dc.titleA comparison of Doppler, tissue Doppler imaging, and strain rate imaging in the assessment of postexercise left ventricular functionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1139/H08-127


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record