Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEvered, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Darren
dc.contributor.authorWatt, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorPerham, Nick
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-01T11:11:50Z
dc.date.available2014-05-01T11:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationEvered, A., Walker, D., Watt, A.A. and Perham, N. (2013) 'To what extent does nonanalytic reasoning contribute to visual learning in cytopathology?', Cancer cytopathology, 121(6), pp.329-338.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1934-662X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10369/5667
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21263
dc.descriptionThis article has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21263en_GB
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Acquisition of visual interpretation skills in cytopathology may involve 2 strategies. Analytic strategies require trainees to base their interpretive decisions on carefully considered and often exhaustive cytomorphologic feature lists, a process that can be time-consuming and inefficient. In contrast, nonanalytic pattern recognition strategies are rarely encouraged during training, even though this approach is characteristic of expert diagnostic behavior. This study evaluated the potential role of nonanalytic learning in cytopathology as an efficient alternative to analytic training. METHODS: Forty-nine cytology novice participants undertook an initial image interpretation test to obtain baseline diagnostic accuracy (test 1). Twenty-four participants subsequently received training in basic cervical cytomorphology and were given a list of cell features for future reference (the "analytic" group). The remaining 25 participants were simply shown 20 nonannotated paired images of normal and abnormal cervical cells (the "nonanalytic" group). Following a practice phase, both groups were retested (test 2). Prior to a final test (test 3), participants in both groups were instructed to adopt a combined analytic/nonanalytic diagnostic strategy. Diagnostic accuracy and response times were measured in each test. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy in both groups improved significantly between tests 1 and 2 (P<.001) but decreased between tests 2 and 3 (P<.05). Speed of response to test images was generally faster under nonanalytic than under analytic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Nonanalytic reasoning in cytopathology image interpretation can be as accurate as traditional feature-based reasoning. Encouraging trainees to adopt pattern recognition strategies may help to expedite the acquisition of visual interpretation skills in cytopathology training programs, yet combining analytic and nonanalytic reasoning do not appear to be effective. © 2013 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCancer Cytopathology
dc.subjectcytopathologyen_US
dc.subjectperceptual learningen_US
dc.subjectpattern recognitionen_US
dc.subjecttrainingen_US
dc.subjectcognitionen_US
dc.titleTo what extent does nonanalytic reasoning contribute to visual learning in Cytopathology?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record