Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHughes, Michael G.
dc.contributor.authorBirdsey, Laurence
dc.contributor.authorMeyers, Rob
dc.contributor.authorNewcombe, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Jon
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Paul M.
dc.contributor.authorStembridge, Mike
dc.contributor.authorStone, Keeron J.
dc.contributor.authorKerwin, David G.
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-12T12:18:33Z
dc.date.available2014-05-12T12:18:33Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationHughes, M.G., Birdsey, L., Meyers, R., Newcombe, D., Oliver, J.L., Smith, P.M., Stembridge, M., Stone, K. and Kerwin, D.G. (2013) 'Effects of playing surface on physiological responses and performance variables in a controlled football simulation', Journal of Sports Sciences, 31(8), pp.878-886.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0264-0414
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.757340
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10369/5685
dc.descriptionThis article was published in Journal of Sports Sciences on 15 January 2013 (online), available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.757340
dc.description.abstractIn spite of the increased acceptance of artificial turf in football, few studies have investigated if matches are altered by the type of surface used and no research has compared physiological responses to football activity on artificial and natural surfaces. In the present study, participants performed a football match simulation on high-quality artificial and natural surfaces. Neither mean heart rate (171 ± 9 beats · min−1 vs. 171 ± 9 beats · min−1; P > 0.05) nor blood lactate (4.8 ± 1.6 mM vs. 5.3 ± 1.8 mM; P > 0.05) differed between the artificial and natural surface, respectively. Measures of sprint, jumping and agility performance declined through the match simulation but surface type did not affect the decrease in performance. For example, the fatigue index of repeated sprints did not differ (P > 0.05) between the artificial, (6.9 ± 2.1%) and natural surface (7.4 ± 2.4%). The ability to turn after sprinting was affected by surface type but this difference was dependent on the type of turn. Although there were small differences in the ability to perform certain movements between artificial and natural surfaces, the results suggest that fatigue and physiological responses to football activity do not differ markedly between surface-type using the high-quality pitches of the present study.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Sports Sciences
dc.subjectsoccer exerciseen_US
dc.subjectsprintsen_US
dc.subjectagilityen_US
dc.subjectfatigueen_US
dc.subjectpitch typesen_US
dc.titleEffects of playing surface on physiological responses and performance variables in a controlled football simulationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record