INTER- AND INTRA-TESTER MEASUREMENT RELIABILITY OF THE RATIO OF ISOMETRIC INTERNAL TO EXTERNAL SHOULDER ROTATION STRENGTH USING A HAND HELD DYNAMOMETER IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS
MetadataShow full item record
Objective To evaluate the intra- and inter-tester reliability of measuring shoulder external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR) strength and the ratio between the two (ER:IR) using a hand held dynamometer (HHD) and to establish a reliable protocol for objective measurement. The study was conducted on a cohort of healthy military and civilian participants between 18 to 40 years old. Design Cohort study Setting British Army Regional Rehabilitation Unit. Participants 25 healthy volunteers (17 male, 8 female), aged 18 – 40 (mean ± standard deviation) 30.9 ± 6.3 years, body mass = 80.6 ± 15.1 kg, and stature = 1.73 ± 0.08 m. (17 males aged 33.1 ± 6.1 years, body mass = 87.3 ± 10.9 kg, and stature = 1.8 ± 0.1 m. Eight females aged 26.1 ± 4.0 years, body mass = 66.3 ± 13.0 kg, and stature = 1.7 ± 0.04 m). Method Shoulder ER and IR isometric muscle strength was measured on two occasions seven days apart using the HHD. Subjects sitting with their glenohumeral joint in neutral and elbow flexed to 90 degrees, conducted three x six second tests for ER and IR. Two testers administered the test to each subject within each session, separated by a 10 minute rest. The level of agreement between strength tests was quantified using the 3 Bland-Altman plotting method and applying the 95% limits of agreement (LoA). The 95% standard error of measurement (SEM) was calculated to quantify variation in individual performance. As a comparator to previous research, ICC (3,1) was also reported. Results ER measurements showed the best agreement with the 95% LoA of 0.3 ± 3.0 kg (Meandiff ± (1.96 × SDdiff)). The SEM was 2.1 kg and ICC = 0.961. The IR measurements showed less agreement with the 95% LoA ranging from 0.2 ± 6.1 kg, a greater SEM of 4.3 kg and ICC = 0.959. Ratio data showed the least agreement between trials with the 95% LoA of 4.0 ± 20.3%, a large SEM of 14.4% and lower ICC = 0.745. Conclusion The study demonstrated that measuring the ratio is not a reliable method but individual scores of ER more than IR are considered reliable. Caution is to be taken when measuring strong participants, as more variation in the scores is obtained. The methodology described can easily be used as protocol in a clinical setting.
- Masters Degrees (Sport) 
Showing items related by title, author, subject and abstract.
The Reliability of Countermovement Jump Performance and the Reactive Strength Index in Identifying Drop-Jump Drop Height in Hurling Players Byrne, Paul J.; Moody, Jeremy A.; Cooper, Stephen-Mark; Kinsella, Sharon (ISAMED, 2017-07-25)The purpose of this study was to estimate the inter-day reliability of countermovement jump performance (CMJ) and the reactive strength index (RSI) in identifying drop-jump drop height in male hurling players. Eighteen ...
Reliability of Sprint Acceleration Performance and Three Repetition Maximum Back Squat Strength in Hurling Players Bryne, Paul; Moody, Jeremy A.; Cooper, Stephen-Mark; Kinsella, Sharon (ARC, 2018)The purpose of this study was to estimate the inter-day reliability of 5, 10 and 20-meter sprint time and three repetition maximum back squat strength in male hurling players. Eighteen male hurling players volunteered to ...
Comparison of two computerised notational analysis systems to reliably analyse work-rate in basketball Cox, Shaun (University of Wales Institute Cardiff, 2010)The main purpose of the current study was to compare the capabilities of Sportscode (version 7) and Trak Performance (version 3.1) in facilitating the time-motion analysis of women’s basketball. Player movements were ...