dc.description.abstract | This investigation has attempted to reveal the processes by which expert rugby union
coaches determined match strategy for particular matches, the knowledge that
facilitated this decision-making and how the coach acquired and developed this
knowledge. Such enquiry was deemed important due to two factors: firstly the
apparent centrality of the Coach's strategic direction of his team's performance to the
pursuit of competitive success. Also a strong positive relationship postulated by
several researchers, between expertise and the nature and effectiveness of the
practitioner's decision-making, suggests that understanding of that practitioner's
decision-making processes is critical to an understanding of the nature of his or her
expertise. Inductive analysis of in-depth interviews with five expert rugby union
coaches suggested that the Coach's strategic preparations for competition included
five major concepts, the Coach's game philosophy, the generation of match strategies,
match preparation, performance evaluation, and the knowledge and skills facilitating
strategic direction. A significant influencing concept in decision-making was the
Coach's game philosophy, an abstract knowledge structure that represented how he
would like his team to play if it was not subject to the constraints of its own ability
and the likely effect of the opposition's efforts. The Coach's particular match
strategies represented a compromise of his game philosophy imposed by these two
factors, his perception of his own team's ability to facilitate the game philosophy. The
game philosophy informed the Coach's match preparations and performance
evaluation, both of his own team and future opposition. It was a function of the
Coach's experience, both personal and vicarious, and this study attempted to explain
its acquisition and development in terms of a theory from mainstream cognitive
psychology. Implications for coach education were identified that suggested coach
education programmes should provide a broad range of opportunities for developing
coaches to challenge themselves in strategic problem-solving situations; only through
this experience will the Coach develop a game philosophy that is both personal and
strategically effective. | en_US |