Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Lowri Cerys
dc.contributor.authorBryant, Anna
dc.contributor.authorKeegan, Richard
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorJones, Anwen Mair
dc.identifier.citationEdwards, L.C., Bryant, A.S., Keegan, R.J., Morgan, K. and Jones, A.M. (2017) 'Definitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: a systematic review', Sports Medicine, 47 (1) pp.113-126en_US
dc.identifier.issn1179-2035 (ESSN)
dc.descriptionThis article was published in Sports Medicine on 30 June 2016 (online), available open access at
dc.description.abstractBackground: The concept of physical literacy has stimulated increased research attention in recent years—being deployed in physical education, sport participation, and the promotion of physical activity. Independent research groups currently operationalize the construct differently. Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a systematic review of the physical literacy construct, as reflected in contemporary research literature. Methods: Five databases were searched using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria were English language, peer reviewed, published by March 2016, and seeking to conceptualize physical literacy. Articles that met these criteria were analyzed in relation to three core areas: properties/attributes, philosophical foundations and theoretical associations with other constructs. A total of 50 published articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively using inductive thematic analysis. Results: The thematic analysis addressed the three core areas. Under definitions, core attributes that define physical literacy were identified, as well as areas of conflict between different approaches currently being adopted. One relatively clear philosophical approach was prominent in approximately half of the papers, based on a monist/holistic ontology and phenomenological epistemology. Finally, the analysis identified a number of theoretical associations, including health, physical activity and academic performance. Conclusions: Current literature contains different representations of the physical literacy construct. The costs and benefits of adopting an exclusive approach versus pluralism are considered. Recommendations for both researchers and practitioners focus on identifying and clearly articulating the definitions, philosophical assumptions and expected outcomes prior to evaluating the effectiveness of this emerging concept. Key points: This paper is the first to provide a systematic review of core attributes of the physical literacy construct, including the defining properties of physical literacy, the philosophical foundations and the theoretical associations of the construct. An implication for theory development and research is the need for transparency and tolerance with different approaches to physical literacy. Implications for applied practice include ensuring clarity of theoretical descriptions and phrases so that these can be translated clearly into a practical setting.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSports Medicine
dc.subjectphysical literacyen_US
dc.subjectphilosophical foundationsen_US
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleDefinitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: a systematic reviewen_US

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as