Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMusoke, David
dc.contributor.authorKarani, George
dc.contributor.authorSsempebwa, John
dc.contributor.authorEtajak, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorGuwatudde, David
dc.contributor.authorMusoke, Miph
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-21T12:53:14Z
dc.date.available2016-07-21T12:53:14Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-15
dc.identifier.citationMusoke, D., Karani, G., Ssempebwa, J.C., Etajak, S., Guwatudde, D. and Musoke, M.B. (2015) 'Knowledge and practices on malaria prevention in two rural communities in Wakiso District, Uganda', African Health Sciences, 15(2), pp.401-412.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1680-6905
dc.identifier.issn1729-0503 (ESSN)
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ajol.info/index.php/ahs/article/view/117514/107079
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10369/7980
dc.descriptionThis article was published in African Health Sciences in 2015, available open access at http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ahs/article/view/117514/107079en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Malaria is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Uganda particularly among children under 5 years of age. OBJECTIVES: The study assessed the knowledge and practices on malaria prevention in 2 rural communities in Wakiso District, Uganda with emphasis on the various prevention methods. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional survey carried out among 376 households using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Log-binomial regression, chi square and Spearman's rank order correlation were used to test for associations. RESULTS: The majority of participants (64.6%) had low knowledge on malaria prevention methods, with untreated mosquito nets (81.7%), mosquito coils (36.9%) and insecticide treated nets (29.6%) being the most known methods. Knowledge on malaria prevention methods was associated with age (χ2 = 32.1; p < 0.01), employment status (χ2 = 18.1; p < 0.01), education (χ2 = 20.3; p = 0.01), income (χ2 = 14.5; p = 0.01) and having heard a malaria message in the previous 12 months (χ2 = 92.3; p < 0.01). Households that had at least one mosquito net were 45.5% and net ownership increased with household income. Only 0.5% of the houses had undergone indoor residual spraying in the previous 12 months, while 2.1% had complete mosquito proofing in windows and ventilators to prevent mosquito entry. CONCLUSION: There is potential to improve practices on malaria prevention by targeting other methods beyond mosquito nets such as installing proofing in windows and ventilators. The integrated approach to malaria prevention which advocates the use of several malaria prevention methods in a holistic manner should be explored for this purpose.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAfrican Journals Onlineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAfrican Health Sciences;
dc.titleKnowledge and practices on malaria prevention in two rural communities in Wakiso District, Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2015


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record