Activity theory, complexity and sports coaching: An epistemology for a discipline
Tuim Viotto Filho, I.A.
Taylor & Francis
MetadataShow full item record
The aim of this article is two-fold. Firstly, it is to advance the case for Activity Theory (AT) as a credible and alternative lens to view and research sports coaching. Secondly, it is to position this assertion within the wider debate about the epistemology of coaching. Following a framing introduction, a more comprehensive review of the development and current conceptualisation of AT is given. Here, AT’s evolution through three distinct phases and related theorists, namely Vygotsky, Leont’ev and Engeström, is initially traced. This gives way to a more detailed explanation of AT’s principal conceptual components, including ‘object’, ‘subject’, ‘tools’ (mediating artefacts), ‘rules’, a ‘community’ and a ‘division of labour’. An example is then presented from empirical work illustrating how AT can be used as a means to research sports coaching. The penultimate section locates such thinking within coaching’s current ‘epistemological debate; arguing that the coaching ‘self’ is not an autonomous individual, but a relative part of social and cultural arrangements. Finally, a conclusion summarises the main points made, particularly in terms in presenting the grounding constructivist epistemology of AT as a potential way forward for sports coaching.
Sport, Education and Society;
Jones, R.L., Edwards, C. and Tuim Viotto Filho, I.A. (2016) 'Activity theory, complexity and sports coaching: An epistemology for a discipline', Sport, Education and Society, 21(2), pp.200-216
This article was first published in Sport, Education and Society on 18 March 2014 (online), available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.895713
Cardiff Metropolitan University (Grant ID: Cardiff Metropolian (Internal))
- Sport Research Groups 
Showing items related by title, author, subject and abstract.
Davies, Ieuan (Cardiff Metropolitan University, 2015)Accepting the linear view of trying to model the coaching process (Lyle, 2002), has led the area of sports coaching to view research and development through an interpretivist epistemology (North, 2013). Following on from ...
'You won't get me drinking their urine in the student bar': A micro political investigation of the transient nature of power within the coaching process O’Grady, Louis Corbin (Cardiff Metropolitan University, 2016-03-09)This study aims to further understanding of the importance of social micro-political interactions within a sporting environment and how a working knowledge of these social aspects can help a coach to facilitate optimal ...
Taylor, Harriet (University of Wales Institute Cardiff, 2011)The coaching process is an under-theorised, ill-defined area (Cote et al, 1995), which as a result causes conflict when researchers have discussed the nature of the process. Indeed, no academic framework exists that depicts ...